While researching the latest move by the RIAA to "sue":http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=10195 individuals, I ran across some interesting papers:
* CSC 8990 Seminars. The first paper is on how PTP actually works and a good description of how to use conventional digital signature techniques to hide who is talking to whom and about what. Also learned a good deal about how these directories actually work.
* "Daniel Peng Suit":http://barillari.org/papers/peng/peng.html. Interesting facts about the suit against someone doing a directory service called Wake.
* "LA Times":http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/business/1971122. Largely sympathetic to the music industry not surprisingly since they all live in LA.
* "The Register":http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/31463.html. The alternative view which is that piracy is a side effect of too expensive albums where you pay an effective price of $16 for one good cut. Also some good notes on encrypted alternatives like "Freenet":http://freenet.sourceforge.net/ and "Waste":http://www.nik.com.au/waste/.
I guess the lesson for me is that the miracle of the Internet is that in 24 hours, you can hear about something and find two good technical responses to it. Amazing.
1 Comments
Sign In
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Rich Tong published on June 28, 2003 9:53 PM.
Campagnolo Derailleurs Explained was the previous entry in this blog.
Ritchey Break-Away is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
Categories
- Apple (13)
- Biking (154)
- Blackberry (37)
- Cars (29)
- Chinese (2)
- Family (19)
- Gadgets (85)
- Guide (33)
- Home Movies (55)
- Home Theater (60)
- House (1)
- Internet (106)
- Movies (27)
- Music (52)
- Networking (9)
- News (3)
- Outdoors (1)
- PCs (421)
- PSP (6)
- Phones (74)
- Photography (80)
- SBS (3)
- Shopping (9)
- Travel (58)
- Watches (3)
- Windows (27)
Monthly Archives
- March 2008 (2)
- February 2008 (34)
- January 2008 (27)
- December 2007 (20)
- November 2007 (17)
- October 2007 (32)
- September 2007 (28)
- August 2007 (26)
- July 2007 (20)
- June 2007 (57)
- May 2007 (29)
- April 2007 (14)
- March 2007 (22)
- February 2007 (9)
- January 2007 (5)
- December 2006 (4)
- November 2006 (13)
- October 2006 (55)
- September 2006 (51)
- August 2006 (93)
- July 2006 (45)
- June 2006 (20)
- May 2006 (73)
- April 2006 (39)
- March 2006 (86)
- February 2006 (38)
- January 2006 (74)
- December 2005 (57)
- November 2005 (48)
- October 2005 (18)
- September 2005 (38)
- August 2005 (49)
- July 2005 (12)
- June 2005 (33)
- May 2005 (66)
- April 2005 (49)
- March 2005 (77)
- February 2005 (55)
- January 2005 (46)
- December 2004 (69)
- November 2004 (70)
- October 2004 (40)
- September 2004 (64)
- August 2004 (16)
- July 2004 (30)
- June 2004 (15)
- May 2004 (71)
- April 2004 (28)
- March 2004 (43)
- February 2004 (49)
- January 2004 (59)
- December 2003 (52)
- November 2003 (60)
- October 2003 (25)
- September 2003 (44)
- August 2003 (34)
- July 2003 (77)
- June 2003 (42)
- May 2003 (49)
- April 2003 (48)
- March 2003 (42)
- February 2003 (41)
- January 2003 (36)
- December 2002 (63)
- November 2002 (96)
- October 2002 (69)
- September 2002 (54)
- August 2002 (36)
- July 2002 (15)
- June 2002 (6)
- May 2002 (45)
- April 2002 (74)
- March 2002 (140)
- February 2002 (12)
- February 2001 (2)
- February 2000 (3)
- January 2000 (1)
- August 1999 (1)
- July 1999 (1)
- February 1998 (1)
- February 1997 (1)
- February 1995 (1)

Edward Felton: He says that there will always be counter measures. Any solution will be non-technical.